ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
SNP variation landscape of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reproductive Physiology, Genetic Architecture, and Management of Duolang Sheep Under Arid-Zone Production Systems: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Polymorphism of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone morphogenetic protein 15 ( Methods: Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 2,409 individuals from 75 global sheep breeds to identify functional variations in Results: 139 SNPs were detected, including 10 exonic variants (6 missense, 2 synonymous, 2 premature stop codons), 9 of which were novel. The high-frequency missense mutation g.54284258A>G (L251P) showed predicted localized conformational changes. Low-frequency stop-gain mutations (e.g., g.54284551C>T) were rare (<0.005%) in domestic breeds. Haplotype H6 (AAAA) predominated in domestic breeds (48.4%), diverging significantly from the wild ancestral H1 (AAGA), indicating artificial selection. The g.54284258A>G variant was significantly associated with live lamb number at first ( Discussion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.