ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
Evaluating Change in Quality of Life as Long-Term Outcome Measure Post Septorhinoplasty: A Systematic Review.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Septo-/rhinoplasty, combining septoplasty and rhinoplasty, addresses both functional nasal impairments and aesthetic concerns. While immediate outcomes are well-studied, long-term impacts on quality of life (QoL) are less explored. Evaluating QoL provides insights into the procedure's comprehensive benefits and limitations. This review synthesizes evidence on long-term QoL changes following septo-/rhinoplasty, identifies predictors of improved outcomes, and offers recommendations to optimize patient satisfaction. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines and the PICOS framework. Inclusion criteria focused on patients with external nasal deformities and/or deviated nasal septum undergoing primary functional or cosmeto-functional septo-/rhinoplasty. Studies published between 2014 and 2024 were included. Validated QoL scales such as Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation were used. Sixteen studies involving 2270 patients met the criteria. Significant long-term QoL improvements were observed across physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Enhanced nasal function, better facial aesthetics, and increased self-confidence were reported. Turbinectomy showed marginally better symptom relief, but no significant differences were found between open and closed rhinoplasty techniques. Patient demographics and psychological traits influenced outcomes. The studies were of moderate to high quality, though randomized trials were lacking. Septo-/rhinoplasty significantly enhances QoL by addressing functional and aesthetic concerns. Improvements in nasal obstruction correlate strongly with overall QoL. Patient-centered care and realistic counseling are essential for optimal satisfaction. Future randomized studies should focus on subgroup-specific outcomes to strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.