ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
Postoperative Plain Radiographic Evaluation of Electrode Placement After Cochlear Implantation: An Observational Study From India.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Reading of Postoperative Cochlear Implant X-Rays.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a rise in the number of cochlear implant (CI) surgeries, limited data is available to date in the Indian settings, on the use of postoperative imaging to confirm intracochlear position of CI electrode array. The current study aims to evaluate the incidence of post-implantation complications related to surgical placement of CI electrode array, as identified on postoperative plain radiographs (X-rays). It also compares the occurrence of such complications amongst different CI manufacturers. The retrospective, observational study incorporated 469 patients (paediatric and adult), who underwent 478 primary cochlear implantations at a tertiary- care CI centre in India, between January 2006 and December 2023. Postoperative day one X-rays were evaluated to check the post-implantation intracochlear position of CI electrode. Angular insertion depths of electrode arrays were measured. Comparison of incidence of electrode related issues was performed amongst devices from four different CI manufacturers used in the study. Postoperative day one X-rays demonstrated normal intracochlear electrode array placement in 93.7 % (448) of the cochlear implantations; whereas electrode-related issues such as kink, incomplete insertion, tip fold-over, basal fold-over, migration and misplacement were identified in 6.3% (30) of the implantations. The percentages of postoperative X-ray abnormalities identified in CI electrodes from Cochlear™ Nucleus® (10.2%) and Oticon Medical (10.5%) were significantly higher than those identified in electrodes from MED-EL (3.8%) and Advanced Bionics (3.7%, p value < 0.05). Assessment of postoperative X-ray findings following CI surgeries conducted over the past 17 years, revealed a statistically significant decline in the overall percentage of electrode-related abnormalities from 12.9% in the years before 2010 to 5.7 % in the subsequent years after 2010 (p-value < 0.05). This study conducted in a large cohort of Indian patients, reiterates that postoperative plain radiography is a simple, reliable, cost-effective imaging technique that can be employed in the Indian settings, to ascertain the post-implantation intracochlear position of CI electrode. Postoperative imaging facilitates optimisation of CI surgery outcomes and leads to timely performance of revision surgeries for correction of electrode position; wherever indicated. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-025-05555-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.