ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2025
Feasibility and Versatility of Facial and Maxillary Artery-based Flaps for Reconstruction of Oral Defects: Double-center Experience with a Standardized Assessment of Outcomes.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conventional vs. tunnelized facial artery myomucosal flaps in oral cavity reconstruction: a comparative analysis of outcomes and quality of life.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstructing oral cavity defects poses significant challenges due to the variability in defect size and location following tumor resection. Myomucosal flaps provide reliable options for medium-sized defects with reduced donor site morbidity, satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 46 patients treated between 2016 and 2022 in two head and neck oncological centers. Inclusion criteria were oral cancer diagnosis, medium-sized surgical defects, and suitability for myomucosal flap reconstruction. Functional outcomes, including tongue mobility, oral opening, and aesthetic satisfaction, were assessed using standardized tools: EORTC QLQ-HN35, PSS-HN, FACT H&N questionnaires, and VAS scores. All flaps were successfully harvested and transposed, with minimal complications. The mean defect size was 4.41 × 3.38 cm. Functional assessment showed a mean oral opening of 3.43 cm and satisfactory tongue mobility (mean score: 6.38). Aesthetic outcomes were rated positively (mean VAS: 7.11). Complications included flap edema (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.