Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40727058›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The effects of distributed leadership on teaching innovation in Shanghai, China: the mediating roles of teacher autonomy, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy.

Jing Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jing GongSchool of Education, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Teaching innovation (TI) is crucial with respect to efforts to cultivate innovative talent and enhance national competitiveness. To promote TI, the Chinese government has issued policy documents that have emphasized the need to overcome the traditional management model, which focuses on the "principal's individual heroism," and to encourage schools to implement distributed leadership (DL) with the goal of achieving multiparty cogovernance. However, few studies have investigated whether and how the implementation of DL in the centralized and bureaucratic management models used in China can foster TI among teachers. Methods: To address this gap, this study examines 3,976 teachers working at the lower secondary level in Shanghai, China, on the basis of data obtained from the 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) dataset; in this context, a structural equation model (SEM) is used to compare a parallel mediation model constructed by reference to self-determination theory (SDT) with a chain mediation model constructed through the integration of SDT with conservation of resources theory (COR). Results: The results of this research reveal the superiority of the chain mediation model, according to which two independent mediation paths pertaining to teacher collaboration (TC) and teacher self- efficacy (TSE), as well as the two chain mediation paths of TC → TSE and teacher autonomy (TA) → TSE, are significant with respect to the relationship between DL and TI. Discussion: Theoretically, this study clarifies the mechanism underlying the influence of DL on TI in collectivist cultures; practically, it provides a reference for management practice for lower secondary school teachers with respect to TI.

Indexed as

conservation of resources theorydistributed leadershipself-determination theoryteacher autonomyteacher collaborationteacher self-efficacyteaching innovation

Identifiers

PMID40727058
PMCPMC12301307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.