ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025
Machine Learning-Driven Prediction of One-Year Readmission in HFrEF Patients: The Key Role of Inflammation.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction models and risk scores in different types of heart failure: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a global health issue with high morbidity and frequent hospitalizations. Predicting one-year readmission risk is crucial for optimizing treatment and reducing costs. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study on adult HFrEF patients admitted to the Cardiovascular Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine on January 2020 and March 2023. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression, with inflammatory biomarkers (PLR, MLR, NLR, SII, SIRI) prioritized. Seven machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained and validated using a 7:3 dataset split; the metrics of the model included the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Brier score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis provided model interpretability. A network-based dynamic nomogram was developed to visualize predictive models. Results: This study included 733 patients, of whom 231 (31.5%) were readmitted within one year. LASSO regression showed that the key predictors included age, BNP, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LVEF, PLR, MLR, AF history, and ACEI/ARB/ARNI usage. The Random Forest (RF) model performed best, with an AUC of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.93), an accuracy of 0.83, a sensitivity of 0.87, and a specificity of 0.80. SHAP analysis showed that BNP was the most influential feature, followed by NYHA class and LVEF, which were also important predictors. In addition, MLR and PLR also played an important role in prediction, once again confirming the important predictive role of MLR and PLR as inflammatory indicators for readmission within one year in HFrEF patients. Conclusion: The ML-based RF model effectively predicted one-year readmission in HFrEF patients, with inflammation indicators playing an important role. Integrating such models into clinical practice could improve risk stratification, reduce readmissions, and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.