ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2025
Enhancing Patient Safety and Charge Capture Through Smart Infusion Pump Interoperability: A Health Economic Analysis for US Health Systems.
Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and future outlook of artificial intelligence and automation in intravenous infusion systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Usability Challenges and Safety Risks of Medical Infusion Pumps: A User-Centered Analysis Across Clinical Roles and Experience Levels in Saudi Arabia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the economic impact of implementing smart infusion pump interoperability for a hypothetical health system in the United States (US). Patients and Methods: An economic model was developed to assess the financial impact of implementing smart infusion pump interoperability with electronic health records (EHRs) for a health system. The model perspective was that of a moderately-large hypothetical US heath-system consisting of 6 hospitals, with 1,500 staffed beds and 50,000 discharges annually. The main outcomes of interest in this model were patient safety and outpatient intravenous (IV) administration charge capture. The impact of interoperability on patient safety was assessed by measuring the estimated reduction in preventable adverse drug events (pADEs). The impact on outpatient charge capture was assessed by estimating the reduction in lost charges due to the implementation of interoperability. All model parameters and inputs were derived and supported by peer-reviewed literature. Results: In the base-case analysis, the implementation of smart infusion pump interoperability resulted in an annual reduction of 56 pADEs, saving the health system $531,891 in associated pADE treatment costs. This equates to a total reduction of 281 pADEs over the 5-year time-horizon, with a cumulative cost savings of $2,659,457. Additionally, the implementation of interoperability recouped $2,419,673 in outpatient infusion administration charges annually, which is equivalent to $12,098,363 in recouped charges over five years. Conclusion: The implementation of smart infusion pump interoperability has the potential to enhance patient safety by reducing pADEs and improving outpatient administration charge capture. However, it is important to note that while the model is based on peer-reviewed model inputs, the model itself is theoretical in nature without real-world data validation and does not account for investment costs. Health systems should carefully evaluate the safety and economic implications of smart infusion pump interoperability when deciding whether to invest in this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.