Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726992›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2025

Enhancing Patient Safety and Charge Capture Through Smart Infusion Pump Interoperability: A Health Economic Analysis for US Health Systems.

Eric P Borrelli, Ashley Taneja, Shafiq Abdallah, Mia Weiss, Nicole S Wilson, Idal Beer, Julia D Lucaci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric P BorrelliHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, MMS, Becton, Dickinson and Company, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9941-9893
Ashley TanejaHEOR Strategic Planning, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-7811
Shafiq AbdallahHEOR Strategic Planning, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Mia WeissHEOR Strategic Planning, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.
Nicole S WilsonMedical Affairs, MMS, Becton, Dickinson and Company, San Diego, CA, USA.
Idal BeerMedical Affairs, MMS, Becton, Dickinson and Company, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-1017
Julia D LucaciHEOR Strategic Planning, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-9002-4600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the economic impact of implementing smart infusion pump interoperability for a hypothetical health system in the United States (US). Patients and Methods: An economic model was developed to assess the financial impact of implementing smart infusion pump interoperability with electronic health records (EHRs) for a health system. The model perspective was that of a moderately-large hypothetical US heath-system consisting of 6 hospitals, with 1,500 staffed beds and 50,000 discharges annually. The main outcomes of interest in this model were patient safety and outpatient intravenous (IV) administration charge capture. The impact of interoperability on patient safety was assessed by measuring the estimated reduction in preventable adverse drug events (pADEs). The impact on outpatient charge capture was assessed by estimating the reduction in lost charges due to the implementation of interoperability. All model parameters and inputs were derived and supported by peer-reviewed literature. Results: In the base-case analysis, the implementation of smart infusion pump interoperability resulted in an annual reduction of 56 pADEs, saving the health system $531,891 in associated pADE treatment costs. This equates to a total reduction of 281 pADEs over the 5-year time-horizon, with a cumulative cost savings of $2,659,457. Additionally, the implementation of interoperability recouped $2,419,673 in outpatient infusion administration charges annually, which is equivalent to $12,098,363 in recouped charges over five years. Conclusion: The implementation of smart infusion pump interoperability has the potential to enhance patient safety by reducing pADEs and improving outpatient administration charge capture. However, it is important to note that while the model is based on peer-reviewed model inputs, the model itself is theoretical in nature without real-world data validation and does not account for investment costs. Health systems should carefully evaluate the safety and economic implications of smart infusion pump interoperability when deciding whether to invest in this technology.

Indexed as

charge captureEHR-connectivityinteroperabilityintravenous infusionspreventable adverse drug eventssmart infusion pump

Identifiers

PMID40726992
PMCPMC12301143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.