Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726964›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental sciences Europe2025

Continuous improvement towards environmental protection for pharmaceuticals: advancing a strategy for Europe.

Sam Harrison, Catherine Barnett, Stephen Short, Cansu Uluseker, Patricia V Silva, Maria D Pavlaki, Sarah Roberts, Madalena Vieira, Stephen Lofts, Susana Loureiro and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental sciences Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sam HarrisonUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP UK.
Catherine BarnettUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP UK.
Stephen ShortUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB UK.
Cansu UlusekerUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP UK.
Patricia V SilvaCESAM- Centre of Environmental and Marine Studies & Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Maria D PavlakiCESAM- Centre of Environmental and Marine Studies & Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Sarah RobertsUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB UK.
Madalena VieiraCESAM- Centre of Environmental and Marine Studies & Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Stephen LoftsUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP UK.
Susana LoureiroCESAM- Centre of Environmental and Marine Studies & Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
David J SpurgeonUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB UK.

Funding

INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSISZ01CT000014 · CIT · COMPUTER RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY · PI WEISS, GEORGE H · 1985 to 2008
$408k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CT000014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manufacture, use and disposal of pharmaceutical products can lead to their release into the environment, raising concerns about potential risks to biota and human health. This is recognised in the European Commission's Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe, which has recently overseen the development of a proposed revision of current pharmaceutical legislation. Amongst other things, this strategy and revision broadly offer strengthened protection against environmental risk. For example, it enhances the power authorities have to refuse market authorisation where an identified risk to the environment cannot be sufficiently addressed, includes a requirement for legacy pharmaceutical products to be risk assessed, includes a broadened scope to cover the entire product lifecycle, and places a greater focus on open data. In this publication, we assess the proposed legislation against the latest scientific knowledge, identifying opportunities for strengthening the protection that it offers. These opportunities include moving towards the risk assessment of mixtures, broadening the scope of effects testing to include non-conventional (e.g., behavioural) and chronic endpoints, making better use of predictive modelling such as Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSARs), and better accounting for environmental heterogeneity, such as the influence of temperature and especially pH on risk. Many of the elements discussed apply not just to pharmaceuticals but across other chemical domains and regulatory regimes, particularly when considering mixture assessment. Integrating knowledge across sectors and regulatory regimes is therefore crucial to better address the role of pharmaceuticals as one of many environmental pollutants.

Indexed as

EcotoxicityEnvironmental exposureEnvironmental risk assessmentPharmaceutical legislationPharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID40726964
PMCPMC12297009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.