Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726947›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Enhancing action recognition in educational settings using AI-driven information systems for public health monitoring.

Changchun Lu, Han Ruijuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Changchun LuLeshan Normal University Physical Culture Institute, Leshan, Sichuan, China.
Han RuijuanCollege of Education Normal College Shihezi University, Shihezi, XinJiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational environments is revolutionizing action recognition, offering a transformative opportunity to enhance public health monitoring. Traditional methods, which primarily rely on rule-based algorithms or handcrafted feature extraction, face significant challenges in adaptability, scalability, and real-time processing. These limitations hinder their effectiveness, particularly in detecting health-related behaviors such as sedentary patterns, social interactions, and hygiene compliance. Methods: To overcome these shortcomings, this research introduces an AI-driven information system that leverages advanced deep learning models and an Adaptive Knowledge Embedding Network (AKEN) to improve action recognition accuracy. The approach integrates AKEN with a Dynamic Personalized Learning Strategy (DPLS) to model student behaviors, predict future actions, and optimize intervention strategies by incorporating factors such as engagement levels, learning progress, and environmental conditions. Results: By utilizing reinforcement learning and explainable AI techniques, the system not only refines recognition accuracy but also ensures transparency in decision-making. Real-time engagement monitoring enhances adaptability, allowing educators and policymakers to make informed interventions. Discussion: Experimental results validate the system's superior performance over conventional approaches, demonstrating its ability to recognize complex behavioral patterns in educational settings. This innovation represents a significant step forward in AI-driven public health monitoring, fostering a safer and more responsive learning environment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePublic HealthHealth BehaviorHumansadaptive knowledge embeddingAI-driven action recognitiondeep learning in educationexplainable AIpublic health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40726947
PMCPMC12301300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.