Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726917›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Development and validation of an alternative method for ergosterol determination in alder leaves using liquid-liquid extraction and LC-MS/MS after saponification.

Björn Kusebauch, Stefan Bader, Steffen Carl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Björn KusebauchGerman Environment Agency (UBA), Section IV 2.5 - Trace Analysis, Artificial Ponds and Streams, Schichauweg 58 12307, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan BaderGerman Environment Agency (UBA), Section IV 2.5 - Trace Analysis, Artificial Ponds and Streams, Schichauweg 58 12307, Berlin, Germany.
Steffen CarlGerman Environment Agency (UBA), Section IV 2.5 - Trace Analysis, Artificial Ponds and Streams, Schichauweg 58 12307, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ergosterol is widely used as proxy for the estimation of leaf litter associated fungal biomass. According to a common textbook method, ergosterol can be extracted from plant tissue with methanolic potassium hydroxide followed by purification with solid-phase extraction (SPE) and detection via high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV). As an alternative, we developed a method using liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) of the methanolic extract with cyclohexane instead of time consuming and error prone SPE. For ergosterol detection, HPLC-UV was replaced by the more sensitive and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The method was validated for alder leaves at 10 µg/g dw (LOQ) and 500 µg/g dw with mean recoveries between 95.1 and 100.2 % (relative standard deviations < 10 %) and has been successfully applied for the measurement of fungicide effects on leaf litter associated aquatic fungi.•Selective and flexible analytical method for ergosterol quantification in alder leaves using LLE and LC-MS/MS instead of SPE and HPLC-UV•Optional use of 7-dehydrocholesterol as internal standard to allow for compensation of volumetric variations during sample preparation and signal drift in LC-MS/MS•Method validation for three mass transitions according to guidance document SANTE/2020/12830 including matrix effect evaluation and stability investigations.

Indexed as

Cryo-millingFungal biomarkerFungal biomassHeat-reflux extractionLeaf litter decompositionMiniaturized sample preparationSemi-closed digestion unit

Identifiers

PMID40726917
PMCPMC12301759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.