ReviewCureus2025
Nanoplastics, Liver Injury, and Oxidative Mechanisms: Translating Animal Models Into Human Risk Assessment.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microplastics in focus: a silent disruptor of liver health- a systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Microplastics, nanoplastics and liver disease: an emerging health concern?Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis of Micro/Nanoplastics in Mammalian Systems: Gut to Systemic Multi-Organ Dysfunction.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have emerged as environmental contaminants of increasing concern due to their potential to disrupt biological systems. The liver, as a key organ in detoxification and metabolism, is particularly susceptible to MNP-induced injury. This scoping review aimed to synthesize experimental evidence from preclinical animal models to identify the principal hepatotoxic mechanisms induced by MNP exposure and evaluate the implications for human health. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenAlex databases. Eligible studies included original research assessing hepatic outcomes in animal models exposed to MNPs. Data were charted for polymer type, particle size, exposure route, exposure duration, and toxicological endpoints. The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included 34 studies. Consistent hepatotoxic signatures were identified, including oxidative stress, inflammation, lipid dysregulation, and apoptosis. Polystyrene, polyethylene, and polylactic acid were the most studied polymers, with exposure via oral gavage or aquatic immersion. Mitochondrial dysfunction and genotoxic markers were also reported. The mechanistic convergence suggests shared injury pathways across particle types and models. MNPs induce liver injury through oxidative, inflammatory, and metabolic mechanisms, supporting their classification as emerging hepatotoxicants. While translational gaps persist, these findings highlight urgent research needs and inform environmental health risk frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.