Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726868›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for a Patient With 94 Brain Metastases in the Setting of Prior Whole Brain Radiation.

Rituraj Upadhyay, Jonathan Schoenhals, Jayeeta Ghose, Eugene Yap, Joseph Pichler, Michael Weldon, Raj Singh, Joshua D Palmer, Wesley Zoller, Aubrie Ward and 2 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rituraj UpadhyayRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Jonathan SchoenhalsRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Jayeeta GhoseRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Eugene YapRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, USA.
Joseph PichlerRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Michael WeldonRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Raj SinghRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Joshua D PalmerRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Wesley ZollerRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Aubrie WardRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Evan ThomasRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Raju RavalRadiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current standard of care treatment for patients with ≥15 brain metastases (BM) is whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), despite poor neurocognitive outcomes. Here, we present our experience treating a young patient with 94 intact brain metastases with SRS in the setting of prior WBRT. A 37-year-old male with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (PD-L1 5%, EGFR exon 19 deletion) initially presented with a seizure and numerous intracranial metastases and previously completed a course of WBRT to a total dose of 3000 cGy in 10 fractions at an outside hospital. He subsequently started first-line oral osimertinib therapy, with baseline PET/CT showing multiple sites of disease. After 18 months from initial diagnosis and WBRT, the patient presented with 94 new brain metastases while on maintenance osimertinib. He had a Karnofsky performance score of 90, no neurological deficits, and only occasional headaches. His baseline cognitive objective Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) score was 29/40. Given his age, failure of EGFR-targeted therapy, and prior WBRT, he was planned for single-isocenter multiple target (SIMT) fractionated SRS to all lesions to a total dose of 2400 cGy in three fractions to 91 lesions and 1800 cGy to three brainstem metastases. He was simulated with a Qfix© Encompass mask (Qfix, Avondale, PA, USA) and treated on a Varian Edge linear accelerator utilizing HyperArc (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA), a 6DOF robotic couch with daily CBCT, and a Varian Optical Surface Monitoring System. A planning target volume (PTV) was created using a 2 mm margin around the GTV, with a smaller margin of 1 mm for brainstem metastases. The total GTV was 8.6 cc and PTV was 40.1 cc. He tolerated SRS well with no acute side effects. Due to progressive systemic disease, he transitioned to atezolizumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination therapy. Follow-up MRI imaging at two and five months was consistent with post-treatment changes, with no increase in the volume or number of brain metastases. His serial PROMIS scores were 29, 29, and 26 at three, six, and nine months of follow-up, respectively. At the last follow-up, 11 months after SRS, he remained free of headaches or new neurological symptoms. Due to the systemic progression of the disease, he transitioned to comfort care 30 months after BM diagnosis and 11 months after SRS. This case illustrates one of the largest numbers of metastases treated in a single course of SRS, and this treatment was well tolerated, with no significant cognitive decline, resulting in a comparable survival outcome to contemporary studies evaluating WBRT in this population.

Indexed as

brain metastases with nsclcegfr mutant lung adenocarcinomalinac-based radiosurgeryosimertinibradiation therapywhole brain rt

Identifiers

PMID40726868
PMCPMC12303361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.