Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726851›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Review of Artificial Intelligence Models for Detecting Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammograms and Their Clinical Implications.

Suchit Chidurala, Parsa Charkhchi, Raajkiran Komirisetty, Keola Ching, Kyra Rozanitis, Tony Jha, Varshaa Koneru, Kal L Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suchit ChiduralaLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Parsa CharkhchiLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Raajkiran KomirisettyLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Keola ChingLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Kyra RozanitisLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Tony JhaLong School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Varshaa KoneruRadiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Kal L ClarkRadiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast arterial calcification (BAC), traditionally regarded as an incidental mammogram finding, is now recognized as a clinically significant marker associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly in women. Despite this association, BAC remains underreported in clinical practice due to the lack of standardized screening protocols and the manual burden of identification. With CVD being the leading cause of mortality among women worldwide and traditional risk calculators often underestimating female cardiovascular risk, the potential of BAC as a surrogate biomarker is increasingly being explored. Mammography, already a widely used screening tool for breast cancer, offers an opportunity to identify BAC and thereby enable dual-purpose screening for both breast and cardiovascular health. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), particularly in deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have shown tremendous promise in detecting and quantifying BAC with high accuracy. Models such as DU-Net, difference-of-Gaussian generative adversarial network (DoG-GAN), and Simple Context U-Net (SCU-Net) utilize U-Net architectures optimized for segmentation and demonstrate performance metrics that rival or surpass human experts. Other approaches, including hybrid models, transfer learning, and ensemble methods, have also achieved strong diagnostic metrics, improving the reliability and scalability of BAC detection. This review consolidates findings from recent studies and technical innovations, evaluating various ML algorithms and their applications in automating BAC identification. In doing so, it highlights the potential of AI to address the long-standing challenge of underreporting and inconsistent quantification of BAC. The clinical implications of AI-enhanced BAC detection are significant. Accurate, automated identification of BAC can improve cardiovascular risk stratification, especially in women whose disease may otherwise go unnoticed by traditional tools. Moreover, at a population level, integrating BAC detection into routine mammogram workflows could yield substantial public health benefits, enabling earlier interventions and reducing overall healthcare costs. By consolidating current models and emphasizing the need for standardized reporting, this review aims to support the integration of AI-based BAC detection into routine clinical practice, thereby enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and preventive care for cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in radiologybreast arterial calcificationcardiovascular disease riskmachine learning (ml)preventative mammogram

Identifiers

PMID40726851
PMCPMC12301706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.