ArticleCureus2025
Fluoroscopy-Guided Removal of Tethered Surgical Drain via Guidewire Electrification: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tethered postoperative drains are not uncommon complications that often require open removal in the operating room, which can increase risks of surgical site infection as well as length of hospitalization. We present a novel method of tethered drain removal through guidewire electrification. A retained deep drain following a posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion was identified after failed manual removal. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the retaining suture was indirectly identified through the obstruction of an inserted guidewire, through which monopolar cautery was applied, breaking the suture and allowing drain removal. The original incision did not need to be re-opened. While further investigation is necessary for validation, this technique shows great promise as an alternative to open removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.