ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2025
Pupillary ultrasonography vs Horner's syndrome to evaluate efficacy of stellate ganglion block in patients.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Postoperative Pain in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Case Report: Relief of long-standing severe motion sickness following stellate ganglion block.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is not only used for treating cervical thoracic, and upper limb pain-related diseases but also for treating sympathetic nervous system dysfunction-related diseases, and it is a widely used clinical treatment method. This study has demonstrated that utilizing ultrasound to measure pupillary diameter (PD) changes and significant inter-eye differences offers a more objective assessment of stellate ganglion block (SGB) efficacy compared to the traditional subjective evaluation based on Horner's syndrome (HS). However, there is currently no objective standard to evaluate the efficacy of SGB. Pupillary ultrasonography can observe precise dynamic changes in the pupils, and is less affected by peripheral light, non-invasive, and convenient. We performed SGB under ultrasound guidance, and evaluated the effectiveness of SGB according to HS in 60 patients. All patients were scored using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before and 24 h after stellate ganglion block treatment. We compared the changes in pupil diameter (PD) and pupillary constriction ratio during pupil light reflex (PLR) in the blocked side and the opposite side. Then we calculated the inter-eye difference of PD before and after SGB, and the inter-eye difference of PD in the blocked side and the opposite side (BO-IED) at each time point. We found that the area under the curve (AUC) for evaluating the effectiveness of SGB was statistically significant at each time points for BO-IED and blocked side inter-eye difference. Additionally, the BO-IED at 15 min after SGB has the largest AUC, when the BO-IED is greater than 0.5 mm, which shows a sensitivity of 86.5 %, and a specificity of 100 %. Our findings suggested an association between pupil reduction and symptom reduction in patients, with the degree of pupil reduction serving as a reference for evaluating the effectiveness of SGB and the degree of symptom relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.