ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Pediatric BurnNet: Robust multi-class segmentation and severity recognition under real-world imaging conditions.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Burn and Wound Care: Image Analysis, Prediction, and Clinical Integration.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026Review
- Interactive AI assisted pediatric burn assessment based on smartphone images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To establish and validate a deep learning model that simultaneously segments pediatric burn wounds and grades burn depth under complex, real-world imaging conditions. Methods: We retrospectively collected 4785 smartphone or camera photographs from hospitalized children over 5 years and annotated 14,355 burn regions as superficial second-degree, deep second-degree, or third-degree. Images were resized to 256 × 256 pixels and augmented by flipping and random rotation. A DeepLabv3 network with a ResNet101 backbone was enhanced with channel- and spatial attention modules, dropout-reinforced Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling, and a weighted cross-entropy loss to counter class imbalance. Ten-fold cross-validation (60 epochs, batch size 8) was performed using the Adam optimizer (learning rate 1 × 10⁻⁴). Results: The proposed Deep Fusion Network (attention-enhanced DeepLabv3-ResNet101, Dfusion) model achieved a mean segmentation Dice coefficient of 0.8766 ± 0.012 and an intersection-over-union of 0.8052 ± 0.015. Classification results demonstrated an accuracy of 97.65%, precision of 88.26%, recall of 86.76%, and an F1-score of 85.33%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded area under the curve values of 0.82 for superficial second-degree, 0.76 for deep second-degree, and 0.78 for third-degree burns. Compared with baseline DeepLabv3, FCN-ResNet101, U-Net-ResNet101, and MobileNet models, Dfusion improved Dice by 15.2%-19.7% and intersection-over-union by 14.9%-23.5% (all Conclusion: Dfusion provides accurate, end-to-end segmentation and depth grading of pediatric burn wounds captured in uncontrolled environments. Its robust performance and modest computational demand support deployment on mobile devices, offering rapid, objective assistance for clinicians in resource-limited settings and enabling more precise triage and treatment planning for pediatric burn care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.