Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726816›Full record

ArticleeNeurologicalSci2025

Changes in conditioned pain modulation using anti-Parkinson drugs in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Eiichirou Urasaki, Yasushi Miyagi, Junji Kishimoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eiichirou UrasakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Mirai Hospital, Medical Co. LTA (Living Together Association), Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasushi MiyagiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fukuoka Mirai Hospital, Medical Co. LTA (Living Together Association), Fukuoka, Japan.
Junji KishimotoCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) highly complain of pain, probably due to the lowered pain threshold caused by dopamine deficiency. Nonetheless, only a few studies have investigated the effects of anti-PD medications on "pain inhibits pain" ability. This study aimed to evaluate conditioned pain modulation (CPM) using the cutaneous silent period (CSP) and the numerical rating scale (NRS) and to investigate the effect of anti-PD medications on CPM. Materials and methods: The CSP was recorded in 40 patients with PD under drug-on and drug-off conditions. Changes in the CSP elicited by electrical test stimulation and in the NRS when the patients experienced pain with cold pressure as a conditioned stimulus were assessed. A shortened CSP duration or reduced CSP score due to cold pressure were interpreted as objective CPM responses. Results: The CSP latency was analyzed in 22 patients when the electromyographic contamination in the CSP waveform was low. The CSP duration shortening during cold pressure was significantly greater under the drug-on condition than under the drug-off condition. The change in CSP duration exhibited a significant correlation with the change in the NRS scores. CSP score analysis was performed on 18 patients in whom latency analysis was difficult owing to electromyographic contamination. In the drug-on state, conditioned cold-pressure pain significantly decreased the CSP score. Conclusions: Dynamic changes in the CSP caused by cold pressure in patients with PD suggest that anti-PD medications may enhance CPM ability.

Indexed as

Anti-Parkinson medicationsCold pressureConditioned pain modulationCutaneous silent periodParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID40726816
PMCPMC12302181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.