ReviewJournal of healthcare informatics research2025
Stress and Emotion Open Access Data: A Review on Datasets, Modalities, Methods, Challenges, and Future Research Perspectives.
Review in Journal of healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The interactive turn in generative AI for self-harm.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Short-Term Detection of Dynamic Stress Levels in Exergaming with Wearables.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating Emotional Stress and Lipid Lowering in Cardiovascular Disease Management: The Future of Precision Cardiovascular Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote continuous patient monitoring is an essential feature of eHealth systems, offering opportunities for personalized care. Among its emerging applications, emotion and stress recognition hold significant promise, but face major challenges due to the subjective nature of emotions and the complexity of collecting and interpreting related data. This paper presents a review of open access multimodal datasets used in emotion and stress detection. It focuses on dataset characteristics, acquisition methods, and classification challenges, with attention to physiological signals captured by wearable devices, as well as advanced processing methods of these data. The findings show notable advances in data collection and algorithm development, but limitations remain, e.g., variability in real-world conditions, individual differences in emotional responses, and difficulties in objectively validating emotional states. The inclusion of self-reported and contextual data can enhance model performance, yet lacks consistency and reliability. Further barriers include privacy concerns, annotation of long-term data, and ensuring robustness in uncontrolled environments. By analyzing the current landscape and highlighting key gaps, this study contributes a foundation for future work in emotion recognition. Progress in the field will require privacy-preserving data strategies and interdisciplinary collaboration to develop reliable, scalable systems. These advances can enable broader adoption of emotion-aware technologies in eHealth and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.