ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Risk Factors for Pleural Reaction in CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Nodule Localization: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of pleural reaction following CT-guided hookwire localization for pulmonary nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pleural reaction (PR) frequently occurs during computed tomography (CT) -guided lung puncture procedures, and its development is influenced by various factors. This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with PR in CT-guided percutaneous lung nodule localization (CT-PLNL) procedures. Methods: This retrospective study included 467 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between January 2022 and December 2023, all of whom had received CT-PLNL. Clinical data, including medical records, imaging findings, and laboratory results, were collected. Univariate analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression identified independent risk factors for PR. Binary logistic regression was performed to further analyze these factors. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess model performance, and Bootstrap validation evaluated discriminative ability. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were conducted to compare predicted versus actual probabilities and assess clinical applicability. Results: The incidence of PR was 5.35% (25/467). Significant variables from univariate analysis and LASSO regression were analyzed by logistic regression. Age, intrapulmonary needle path adjustment, inadequate anesthesia, and a history of diabetes were identified as independent risk factors for PR. ROC curves showed Area Under the Curve (AUC) values indicating excellent discriminative ability. Calibration curves showed appropriate fit, and DCA demonstrated high clinical applicability. Conclusion: Younger age groups, intraprocedural needle adjustments, inadequate anesthesia, and diabetes were independent risk factors for PR after CT-PLNL. Optimizing anesthesia, avoiding unnecessary needle manipulations, and perioperative glucose monitoring in diabetic patients may mitigate PR risks and enhance procedural safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.