Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726724›Full record

ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Patient satisfaction: A feature of quality metrics within the inpatient healthcare system - A narrative review.

Ali B A Jabbar, Eva M Holland, Abubakar Tauseef, Amna Noor, Maryam Zafar, Muazzam Mirza, Thaler Klaus, Thomas Frederickson, Mohsin Mirza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali B A JabbarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.
Eva M HollandDepartment of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.
Abubakar TauseefDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.
Amna NoorDepartment of Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Science, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maryam ZafarDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muazzam MirzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States.
Thaler KlausChief Medical Officer - CHI Health Bergan Mercy Hospital, Omaha, NE, United States.
Thomas FredericksonSystem Vice President Hospital Medicine Operations, CommonSpirit Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Mohsin MirzaSite Director of CHI Health Bergan Mercy Hospital, Associate Program Director of the Internal Medicine Department at Creighton University, Division Chief of HMS Division.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey reports patients' perceptions of hospital care. Analyzing results from HCAHPS surveys has been instrumental in assessing and improving patient perceptions of this care. The interactions primary care physicians have with patients in the hospital setting can have a direct impact on this score. While isolated studies have reviewed specific areas that may affect HCAHPS outcomes, we aimed to compile the existing literature from the past five years. Methods: EMBASE, PUBMED, and Ovid Medline were searched from each database from 2019 to 2023 to retrieve published data in English language articles addressing interventions to improve patient satisfaction. Main keywords in the manuscripts included: "Patient satisfaction," "HCAHPS," "intervention," "survey," "database," "communication," and "implementation." Results: We deduced seven important factors and interventions that affect HCAHPS scores: 1) Infection prevention protocols negatively impacted patient satisfaction. 2) Geographic allocation of patients did not significantly affect scores. 3) Physician-patient communication was critical in determining patient satisfaction. 4) Training programs, like the acknowledge, introduce, duration, explanation, and thank you approach led to substantial improvements. 5) Addressing language barriers positively impacted satisfaction rates for Limited English Proficient patients. 6) The influence of residents on patient satisfaction varied. 7) Age-related differences in patient care perceptions were observed, with older patients reporting fewer positive experiences, particularly in communication-related measures. Conclusions: Several different types of interventions have been beneficial in improving the patient satisfaction scores. Overall, further research is needed to provide further evidence for efficacy of these interventions.

Indexed as

HCAHPSinpatient healthcare systemnarrative reviewpatient satisfactionquality metrics

Identifiers

PMID40726724
PMCPMC12296304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.