ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Patient satisfaction: A feature of quality metrics within the inpatient healthcare system - A narrative review.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom Burden and Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients with Cancer in a Day Care Unit.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Women's Satisfaction with Gynecological Healthcare Services in a Public Tertiary Facility: A Questionnaire Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey reports patients' perceptions of hospital care. Analyzing results from HCAHPS surveys has been instrumental in assessing and improving patient perceptions of this care. The interactions primary care physicians have with patients in the hospital setting can have a direct impact on this score. While isolated studies have reviewed specific areas that may affect HCAHPS outcomes, we aimed to compile the existing literature from the past five years. Methods: EMBASE, PUBMED, and Ovid Medline were searched from each database from 2019 to 2023 to retrieve published data in English language articles addressing interventions to improve patient satisfaction. Main keywords in the manuscripts included: "Patient satisfaction," "HCAHPS," "intervention," "survey," "database," "communication," and "implementation." Results: We deduced seven important factors and interventions that affect HCAHPS scores: 1) Infection prevention protocols negatively impacted patient satisfaction. 2) Geographic allocation of patients did not significantly affect scores. 3) Physician-patient communication was critical in determining patient satisfaction. 4) Training programs, like the acknowledge, introduce, duration, explanation, and thank you approach led to substantial improvements. 5) Addressing language barriers positively impacted satisfaction rates for Limited English Proficient patients. 6) The influence of residents on patient satisfaction varied. 7) Age-related differences in patient care perceptions were observed, with older patients reporting fewer positive experiences, particularly in communication-related measures. Conclusions: Several different types of interventions have been beneficial in improving the patient satisfaction scores. Overall, further research is needed to provide further evidence for efficacy of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.