ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Quality assessment of routine antenatal care services provided at a primary healthcare facility in a rural area of Delhi, India: A record-based study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antenatal care (ANC) can be defined as the care provided by skilled health-care professionals to pregnant women in order to ensure the best health outcomes. Good quality routine antenatal care forms the foundation of positive pregnancy experience. The primary care facilities play a significant role in improving antenatal care in peripheral areas. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to assess the quality of ANC provided to pregnant women at a primary health care facility in a rural area of Delhi. Available previous records from 1 Results: Records of 611 women were analysed. The overall mean score of ANC-QAT in our study was 18.97 (SD = 6.02). 28% of the women received poor quality ANC (score ≤ 15), 55.5% received satisfactory quality ANC (score 16-25), and 16.5% received good quality ANC (score ≥ 26). Chi-square results showed that the women who belonged to a joint family, those who had education till high school or above, and those with a history of previous complications were more likely to have four or more ANC visits as compared to their counterpart. Conclusion: The majority of the women received satisfactory or good quality antenatal care. However, there is a scope for improvement in certain areas such as the number of ANC visits, blood investigations, deworming, and record keeping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.