Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726714›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Quality assessment of routine antenatal care services provided at a primary healthcare facility in a rural area of Delhi, India: A record-based study.

Priya Kataria, Madhu K Upadhyay, Karuna Arya, Naresh Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Priya KatariaDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Madhu K UpadhyayDepartment of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Karuna AryaDepartment of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Naresh KumarDepartment of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antenatal care (ANC) can be defined as the care provided by skilled health-care professionals to pregnant women in order to ensure the best health outcomes. Good quality routine antenatal care forms the foundation of positive pregnancy experience. The primary care facilities play a significant role in improving antenatal care in peripheral areas. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to assess the quality of ANC provided to pregnant women at a primary health care facility in a rural area of Delhi. Available previous records from 1 Results: Records of 611 women were analysed. The overall mean score of ANC-QAT in our study was 18.97 (SD = 6.02). 28% of the women received poor quality ANC (score ≤ 15), 55.5% received satisfactory quality ANC (score 16-25), and 16.5% received good quality ANC (score ≥ 26). Chi-square results showed that the women who belonged to a joint family, those who had education till high school or above, and those with a history of previous complications were more likely to have four or more ANC visits as compared to their counterpart. Conclusion: The majority of the women received satisfactory or good quality antenatal care. However, there is a scope for improvement in certain areas such as the number of ANC visits, blood investigations, deworming, and record keeping.

Indexed as

Antenatal careprimary carequality assessmentrural healthcare

Identifiers

PMID40726714
PMCPMC12296325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.