Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726707›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Health workforce status in India: A qualitative analysis of parliamentary questions documented in the last two decades.

G Jeevitha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Health workforce status in India and parliamentary questions.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G JeevithaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, SRM Dental college, Ramapuram, Bharathi Salai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unequal health workforce distribution is a major issue in India that causes health inequality and difficulties in health delivery. There have to be optimal numbers of all health workers including doctors, staff nurses, and paramedical staff like radiographers, pharmacists, attenders, ANMs, and ANWs for the effective working of health Institutions. Introduction: The parliament is a powerful organization in a democratic country where member representatives from different parts of the country can raise questions or debates on crucial issues of the nation. These submitted documents form a major source of data for policy analysis. Materials and Materials: Questions on health workforce shortage were collected from the official websites of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha and thematic analysis was done with inductive reasoning. Themes and subthemes were categorized and questions were coded into nodes using Max QDA software. Results: A total of 1016 questions (0.18%) were asked with 577 (0.17%) questions from Lok Sabha and 441 (0.19%) from Rajya Sabha. A total of 208 unique parliamentarians from 26 unique states/UTs had submitted questions on the current theme. Discussion: The questions were of competing interests with the majority of questions on recruitment in the government health sector and strategies needed for balancing the inequality in workforce distribution. More questions with stronger representation are needed for the sub-themes of rural and tribal scenarios, shortage of specialists, women staff, and paramedical staff, which could help in correcting the lacunae in the national healthcare system.

Indexed as

Ayushhealth workforceLok Sabhaparliamentary questionpolicy planningRajya Sabha

Identifiers

PMID40726707
PMCPMC12296282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.