ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: Do children with early onset of <4 years of age, really need standard therapy?
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are no separate guidelines available for the management of pediatric population with early onset nephrotic syndrome, even if they have difficult disease course. So we conducted this study to analyze the response of the standard steroid regime in these children with early onset (<4 years) steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study with follow-up. Data from children having steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome were recorded and divided into two groups: disease onset >1 to ≤4 years of age and disease onset >4 to 10 years of age, and the outcome in these children, treated with standard steroid regimen, was compared. Results: This study included a total of 41 children. Fewer days taken to remission in the first episode, more number of relapses within 6 months of treated first episode, and more number of infection-triggered relapses were significantly associated with the early onset group, while significantly more days were taken to remission in group 2. There was no difference statistically in both cohorts in terms of disease limitation to first episode, no. of mean relapses, cumulative steroid doses, and the need for steroid-sparing agents. Conclusion: More days taken to remission in relapses and more no. of relapses within 6 months of treatment, still no need for increased steroid cumulative doses and steroid-sparing drugs in early onset nephrotic syndrome, defy the need for different therapies or regimes, but in view of significant infection-triggered relapses, role of general hygienic measures, nutrition, and vaccination must be emphasized in these children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.