ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Household healthcare expenditure: A cross-sectional analysis of urban and rural Puducherry, South India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global healthcare financing landscape highlights the heavy out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) burden on households, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like India. Despite efforts towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC), challenges persist. This study in Puducherry aims to estimate the prevalence and amount of OOPE and catastrophic health expenditure (CHE), with a focus on comparing the findings with a 2016 study conducted in the same study setting. Methods: A cross-sectional study in rural and urban areas collected data from 378 households using a pilot-tested National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) questionnaire. Utilizing a systematic random sampling method, 189 households from each setting were selected. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 23, with OOPE and CHE prevalence presented as percentages with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Overall, 46.6% (n = 378) of all households and 91.6% (n = 192) of households that utilized healthcare services in the past 6 months experienced OOPE. 36.5% of households incurred direct medical expenses, with higher prevalence in urban areas. Non-medical expenditures were reported by 41.5% of households, more prominently in rural settings. Moreover, 13.2% of households experienced CHE, with a higher proportion in rural areas. The study highlights a notable decrease in OOPE from 2016 to 2023, with higher expenditure risks associated with chronic diseases. Conclusion: The study unveils healthcare spending patterns in urban and rural Puducherry, emphasizing the significant burden of out-of-pocket expenses and CHEs. It underscores the urgency for interventions to enhance healthcare affordability, particularly in rural areas, where disparities are more pronounced, necessitating targeted efforts to alleviate economic strains and improve access to healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.