Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726688›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

A separate set of guidelines for screen time used for recreation versus education-The need of hour for a child's education in post-COVID era.

Neha Thakur Rai, Arvind Kumar Singh, Devesh Kumar Shukla, Narendra Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neha Thakur RaiDepartment of Paediatrics, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arvind Kumar SinghDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Devesh Kumar ShuklaDepartment of Paediatrics, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Narendra RaiDepartment of Paediatrics, Chandan Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The duration of time spent on electronic or digital media is defined as screen time. Digital media expansion and COVID-19 pandemic have made children more inclined towards screen time both as a necessity and as a habit. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study on children, aged two to five years, was conducted for one year (2021-2022). Parents were asked to self-fill a designed questionnaire. Impacts on physical and mental health of children and the necessity of screen time were assessed by paediatrician and psychologist. Results: A total of 650 children (354 boys and 296 girls) participated in the study. The mean screen time of parents was 6.4 hours. ± 2.32 and children were 4.95 ± 2.34 hours. 98.75% of children had screen time more than that recommended for age. Children were exposed to screen time at the tender age of three months. COVID-19 increased screen time by more than 1 hour in 92% of children. The most common gadget used was mobile phones (n = 628, 96.6%), followed by television (n = 511, 78.7%). Screen time had a negligible effect ( Conclusion: Findings suggested poor awareness among parents/caregivers regarding the negative impact of high screen time on children. Parents felt that screen time was a part of a normal day-to-day life and was important, particularly in post-COVID era when education was shifted from schools to laptops.

Indexed as

Addictionbehaviourcoronavirushealthscreen timetechnology

Identifiers

PMID40726688
PMCPMC12296237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.