ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Age predominates as associate than reproductive health stage for 5 min heart rate variability in middle aged women- a cross-sectional study from Gujarat, India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiometabolic Health During the Climacteric Transition: A Narrative Review of Lifestyle, Physiological, and Nutritional Approaches.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Study of cognitive functions and heart rate variability in reproductive-age group and post-menopausal women.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular health is adversely affected by menopausal transition with reduced heart rate variability (HRV) as a manifest. Electrocardiogram (ECG) based 5 min HRV has worsening trend from premenopausal to postmenopausal stage, but age is the biggest confounder. We aimed to study 5 min HRV among age-matched sample population of premenopausal, perimenopausal and postmenopausal healthy women. Methodology: A cross-sectional field study was conducted on apparently healthy women of 40-55 years of age. STRAW+10 criteria were used to stratify reproductive health stage groups. Lead II ECG-based 5 min HRV (VarioWin HR software) was recorded in supine position using standard protocol. Meticulous age matching was used to create premenopausal, perimenopausal (early and late), and postmenopausal (early and late) subgroups. Various age-matched pairs of subgroups were compared for time domain, frequency domain, and geometric HRV parameters. Results: There was a lack of significant difference among premenopausal, perimenopausal and postmenopausal subgroups. Difference of HRV was small, insignificant without any general pattern in age matched pair of: premenopausal verses early perimenopausal group ( Conclusion: Middle aged healthy women revealed lack of difference of 5 min HRV parameters between premenopausal, perimenopausal or postmenopausal women after age-matching. This lack of association indicates age and other confounders as significant attribute for HRV than the reproductive health status of women, and its calls for further study for reinforcement and causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.