ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Age and gender patterns in COVID-19: Insights from a Regional COVID-19 testing center.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Asymptomatic and targeted testing are critical for mitigating the spread of COVID-19. Understanding testing demand is crucial for efficient personnel and resource management. The study analyzes testing data to uncover factors influencing testing demand. Methods: Testing and infection data were consolidated into weekly intervals, grouped into pediatric (0-17.99 years), adult (18-64.99 years), and geriatric (65 + years) cohorts, and plotted longitudinally. Changes in overall testing, infectivity, and age-appropriate vaccination availability were analyzed between groups. Simple paired t-table Chi-square testing calculated significance ( Results: Of 69,612 COVID-19 tests, 13,447 (19.3%) were pediatric, 48,084 (69.1%) were adult, and 8,081 (11.6%) were geriatric. A high correlation was seen for pediatric vs. adult (0.73; Conclusion: Pediatric testing was more associated with times of high infectivity and did not benefit from vaccination availability. Gender differences occurred between groups, but influences did not change gender ratios within each group. Understanding factors altering COVID-19 testing patterns can inform management of resource and personnel allocation for the next public health crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.