ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Awareness and attitudes toward euthanasia: A cross-sectional study among diverse demographic groups in India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Definitional confusion in nurses' and physicians' attitudes toward euthanasia in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Euthanasia remains a contentious issue worldwide, with attitudes and awareness varying significantly across different cultures and professional groups. This study aims to explore the knowledge and attitudes toward euthanasia among a diverse group of participants and identify demographic factors influencing these perspectives. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 600 participants using a structured questionnaire to assess their knowledge and attitudes toward euthanasia. The data were analyzed using statistical methods, with focus on demographic variables such as sex, age, occupation, and religious beliefs. Results: The study found that male participants had higher awareness scores (mean score: 4.52) compared to females (mean score: 4.27), although this difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for targeted educational programs and legal frameworks to address knowledge gaps and support informed decision-making regarding euthanasia. Demographic factors significantly influence attitudes, necessitating culturally sensitive policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.