Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726638›Full record

ArticleNeuroethics2025

Revolutionizing Brain Research Using Portable MRI in Field Settings: Public Perspectives on the Ethical and Legal Challenges.

Molly K Madzelan, Frances Lawrenz, Susan M Wolf, Francis X Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Molly K MadzelanFederation of Associations in Behavioral & Brain Sciences, Washington, DC USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4761-1349
Frances LawrenzUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6317-7992
Susan M WolfUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9547-2200
Francis X ShenUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9029-1686

Funding

Highly Portable and Cloud-Enabled Neuroimaging Research: Confronting Ethics Challenges in Field Research with New PopulationsRF1MH123698 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LAWRENZ, FRANCES PATRICIA, SHEN, FRANCIS X · 2020 to 2020
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: New, highly portable MRI (pMRI) technology promises to revolutionize brain research by facilitating field-based studies that can expand research to new settings beyond the traditional MRI suite in a medical center. At this early stage of development, understanding public knowledge and attitudes about pMRI research is crucial. Objective: In this article we present the first empirical study of the general public's willingness to participate in pMRI research, and their perceptions of expected benefits and concerns. Methods & Results: We conducted a nationally representative online survey (N = 2,001) administered Aug. 15-31, 2022. We found that respondents were overwhelmingly willing to participate in pMRI research, with no significant differences between five key demographic sub-groups: rural residents, older adults (65+), Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks, and those economically disadvantaged. Respondents saw many potential benefits (e.g., follow-up information about the study's results) and few concerns (e.g., insufficient payment) associated with participating. Conclusion: Such high public interest in participating confirms the importance of developing ethical guidance for pMRI research now, before that research rapidly expands. The results speak to the importance of minimizing the therapeutic misconception in pMRI research, as the survey reveals gaps in participant knowledge about the capabilities and limitations of pMRI devices to provide clinically informative scans. Our data showed that a lack of trust in scientists can reduce likelihood of participation, and thus researchers will need to engage participant communities to fully realize the potential of pMRI research to reach remote and historically underrepresented populations. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4.

Indexed as

Community engagementNeuroethicsNeuroimagingPortable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Research ethicsTherapeutic misconception

Identifiers

PMID40726638
PMCPMC12296799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.