ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Effectiveness of fermentation broth of
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Ninety patients with primary insomnia were divided into two groups: the FBCS group ( Results: Significant main effects of time and time × group interaction on the PSQI total score and all subcomponents. Significant group effects were also observed for most subcomponents, except for Sleep Disturbances and Daytime Function, indicating greater improvements in the FBCS group over time. After 14 and 28 days of FBCS consumption, the treatment group demonstrated greater reductions in PSQI total scores compared to the control group. Subcomponent analysis revealed greater improvements in the FBCS group compared to the control group at both time points. Specifically, Sleep Quality scores decreased by -0.89 vs. -0.50 at Day 14 and -1.32 vs. -0.45 at Day 28. Sleep Onset Latency improved by -0.75 vs. -0.20 at Day 14 and -1.32 vs. -0.27 at Day 28. Sleep Duration scores decreased by -0.86 vs. -0.20 at Day 14 and -1.20 vs. -0.23 at Day 28. Sleep Efficiency showed a decline of -0.82 vs. +0.23 at Day 14 and -1.11 vs. +0.30 at Day 28. For Sleep Disturbances, the FBCS group improved by -0.41 vs. -0.05 at Day 14 and -0.55 vs. +0.14 at Day 28. Lastly, Daytime Function scores decreased by -0.73 vs. -0.07 at Day 14 and -0.95 vs. -0.18 at Day 28. Conclusion: The FBCS demonstrated significant effectiveness in improving overall sleep outcomes among patients with primary insomnia. Moreover, the use of DHT enhanced patient adherence and facilitated reliable data collection. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html, identifier ChiCTR2100051187.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.