Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

The HOME (home monitoring of high-risk pregnancies) study: a study protocol for an observational study of a telemedicine-assisted follow-up at home vs. hospitalization.

Åsa Henning Waldum, Aase Serine Devold Pay, Gunvor Aasbø, Vinod Kumar Mishra, Meryam Sugulle, Anne Cathrine Staff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05763069 (The HOME Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05763069 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

The HOME Study: Home Monitoring of High-risk Pregnancies

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorOslo University HospitalRan2022 to 2040Enrolled250ConditionsHypertensive Disorder of Pregnancy, Premature Preterm Rupture of Membranes, Preeclampsia, High Risk PregnancyArmsHome surveillance of pregnancies at risk
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Åsa Henning WaldumDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Aase Serine Devold PayDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Gunvor AasbøDepartment of Public Health Science and Interdisciplinary Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Vinod Kumar MishraDepartment of Finance and Resource Management Unit, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Meryam SugulleDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Cathrine StaffDivision of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnancies at high risk for adverse health outcomes for mother and offspring often require long-term antenatal hospitalization and/or frequent outpatient visits. We have developed a telemonitoring home care service for high-risk pregnancies that has been integrated into the Electronic Patient Journal System of our department. We will compare clinical safety, patient-reported outcome measures, and use of healthcare resources compared to standard practice for hospital admissions and/or outpatient visits. Method: The home monitoring of high-risk pregnancies study is an ongoing observational study. Eligible women with a pregnancy requiring intensified obstetric follow-up (e.g., preterm premature rupture of membranes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, or a previous adverse obstetric outcome) are offered study inclusion to either standard care at the hospital or the home telemonitoring group, depending on available home monitoring equipment. Pregnant women included for home monitoring will be telemonitored according to relevant clinical practice for inpatients, including the use of cardiotocography, blood pressure monitoring, C-reactive protein, and temperature measurement, and they will provide self-registration of relevant clinical symptoms. A telecare patient communication system will prompt rapid contact with the hospital in the case of unfavorable registered clinical parameters or subjective symptoms. The home telemonitored women will attend hospital visits for fetal ultrasound assessment at individually assigned intervals. Patients undergoing in-hospital care will serve as the control group in this study and receive standard care. The primary outcome is a composite of severe maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes (sepsis, eclampsia, cerebral hemorrhage, acute respiratory distress syndrome, liver rupture, pulmonary embolism, amniotic fluid embolism, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets, HELLP without hemolysis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation), including fetal or neonatal mortality, maternal mortality, and signs of severe organ damage. Secondary outcomes include other adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal health outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and economic cost analyses. Discussion: The implementation of a home care service for women with high-risk pregnancies requiring intensified surveillance is expected to be equally safe and more comfortable and convenient for the women, with lower economic costs. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05763069.

Indexed as

fetal membraneshigh-risk, hospitalizationhome care servicespatient reported outcome measurespregnancypremature rupturesafetytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40726590
PMCPMC12301385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.