ArticleERJ open research2025
Rare variants in
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension as an Inflammation-Angiogenesis Disorder: From Thrombus Persistence to Dual Pulmonary Vasculopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- The genetics of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: no longer a stab in the dark.ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pathogenesis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is poorly understood. Studies of the genetic risk factors for CTEPH are likely to improve our understanding of CTEPH pathogenesis and may lead to novel treatment and prevention strategies. Genetic analysis focused on shared gene variants in high-risk disease pedigrees can aid in the identification of rare variants with a strong effect on disease risk. Methods: We identified 13 CTEPH high-risk pedigrees and performed whole-exome sequencing in 22 CTEPH cases from these pedigrees, focusing on rare and deleterious variants that were shared between related CTEPH cases. We validated CTEPH candidate gene variants in two independent CTEPH cohorts, one from Utah (n=78) and one from the University of California San Diego (n=238), and compared them to controls from the UK Biobank. Results: A rare and predicted deleterious missense variant in Conclusions: Rare variants in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.