Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726439›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2025

Using Machine Learning to Improve Control for Confounding in the Dynamic Weighted Ordinary Least Squares Estimator of Optimal Adaptive Treatment Strategies.

Kossi Clément Trenou, Miceline Mésidor, Aida Eslami, Hermann Nabi, Caroline Diorio, Denis Talbot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kossi Clément TrenouDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Miceline MésidorDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Aida EslamiDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Hermann NabiDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Caroline DiorioDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Denis TalbotDépartement de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-3314

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 312198Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-04911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimating optimal adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) can be done in several ways, including dynamic weighted ordinary least squares (dWOLS). This approach is doubly robust as it requires modeling both the treatment and the response, but only one of those models needs to be correctly specified to obtain a consistent estimator. For estimating an average treatment effect, doubly robust methods have been shown to combine better with machine learning methods than alternatives. However, the use of machine learning within dWOLS has not yet been investigated. Using simulation studies, we evaluate and compare the performance of the dWOLS estimator when the treatment probability is estimated either using machine learning algorithms or a logistic regression model. We further investigate the use of an adaptive

Indexed as

BiometryMachine LearningBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLeast-Squares Analysisadaptive treatment strategiescross‐fittingdynamic weighted ordinary least squares (dWOLS)machine learningpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID40726439
PMCPMC12305482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.