Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726308›Full record

ArticleAORN journal2025

Perioperative Communication Gaps: A Qualitative Exploration.

Elizabeth Rassier, Heather J Carmack, Amy White, Jessica Engen, Sara Elliott, Melissa Aeschlimann, Elizabeth E Umberfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AORN journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth Rassier
Heather J Carmack
Amy White
Jessica Engen
Sara Elliott
Melissa Aeschlimann
Elizabeth E Umberfield

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication breakdowns are a leading cause of sentinel events in health care environments, including perioperative areas. Effective interdisciplinary communication exchanges can contribute to staff member collaboration and patient safety. This qualitative research study explored perceptions associated with communication among surgical services personnel across the perioperative phases of care. At a variety of sites in a midwestern health system, focus group participants (ie, OR RNs, preoperative and postoperative RNs, surgical technologists, surgical assistants, patient care assistants, and sterile processing technicians) discussed communication workflows and areas of communication gaps. Focus group data were then analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis techniques, which revealed three themes regarding communication gaps: technology impacts on communication, communication inconsistencies, and communication omission and audience. Although additional research is needed, perioperative nurses should be aware of communication gaps as they strive to enhance patient safety, improve workflow efficiency, and foster a positive perioperative care environment.

Indexed as

CommunicationPerioperative CarePerioperative NursingFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Researchcommunication gapsfocus groupsrapid qualitative analysis (RQA)structured checkliststeam communication

Identifiers

PMID40726308
PMCPMC12313210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.