ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2025
Trajectories of Childhood Adversity and Eating Disorders in Adolescence.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Disparity and Treatment-Seeking in Eating Disorders During Childhood and Adolescence: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.JAACAP open · 2026Article
- Sugar- and artificially sweetened beverages consumption, body weight, and eating disorders symptoms: findings from a Danish cohort from childhood to early adulthood.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Trajectories of Childhood Adversity and Eating Disorders in Adolescence.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveChildhood adversities are linked to eating disorders (EDs), but their cumulative and evolving nature is often overlooked. This study employs a comprehensive measure of adversities, captured through trajectories across ages 0-9, to examine associations with (1) clinically diagnosed EDs at ages 10-18 and (2) a composite outcome of diagnosed and self-reported ED symptoms at age 18. Differences between diagnosed and non-diagnosed EDs were also assessed.
methodsData from children born in Denmark between 1996 and 2003 (total population; N = 500,240) and participants in the 18-year follow-up of the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC-18; N = 43,687, 50% of those eligible for invitation) were used. Diagnosed EDs were identified through national registers, and non-diagnosed EDs through the DNBC-18. Adversities were grouped into three predefined dimensions: material deprivation, loss or threat of loss, and family dynamics. A group-based multi-trajectory model identified trajectories from ages 0-9. Associations were analyzed using quasi-Poisson and multinomial logistic regression.
resultsFour trajectory groups were identified: low adversity (72.1%), material deprivation (18.0%), loss or threat of loss (5.5%), and high adversity (4.4%). < 1% had a diagnosed ED, while 2.5% had a non-diagnosed ED, both more common in females. While no overall associations were found in the total population, the high adversity group had a higher risk of eating disorders not otherwise specified (EDNOS) compared to the low adversity group (IRR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.16-2.12). In the DNBC-18 analyses, a higher risk in the high adversity group compared to the low adversity group, was entirely driven by non-diagnosed EDs (RRR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.37-2.20).
conclusionIndividuals exposed to high adversity had a higher risk of EDs, particularly non-diagnosed cases, highlighting a diagnostic gap shaped by differences in symptom recognition, help-seeking, and access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.