Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726154›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

Intratumoral preservation of the stem-like malignant cell proportion in glioblastoma, prognostic impact, and its radiomethylomic signatures.

Yuji Matsumoto, Omkar Singh, Jose Garcia, Zied Abdullaev, Nelson F Freeburg, Fanyang Yu, Hamed Akbari, Kyunglok Baik, Jun Guo, Natalie N C Shih and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yuji MatsumotoCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Omkar SinghLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jose GarciaCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Zied AbdullaevLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nelson F FreeburgDepartment of Cancer Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fanyang YuCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Hamed AkbariDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-3707
Kyunglok BaikCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jun GuoCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Natalie N C ShihDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Erik ToorensPenn Genomic Analysis Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tapan GangulyPenn Genomic Analysis Core, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dominique BallingerAbramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Donald M O'RourkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Suyash MohanDivision of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer J D MorrissetteDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dana SilverbushDepartment of Cancer Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kenneth AldapeLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-7550
Christos DavatzikosCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1025-8561
MacLean P NasrallahDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-0898

Funding

Statistical atlases of brain tumor MRI:do imaging phenotypes predict progression?R01NS042645 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2002 to 2024
$8.7M
Generalizable quantitative imaging and machine learning signatures in glioblastoma, for precision diagnostics and personalized treatment: the ReSPOND consortiumR01CA269948 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Christos Davatzikos · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269948NCI NIH HHS R01CA269948NIHNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042645NINDS NIH HHS R01NS042645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) exhibits significant intratumoral heterogeneity. However, the presence and extent of intratumoral heterogeneity of stem-like and differentiated cell components based on methylation profiles remain poorly understood. Furthermore, the utility of integrating methylation profiles with radiomic features (radiomethylomics) for predicting these cellular states has not been explored.

methodsWe analyzed 248 samples from 133 GBM patients, including 157 samples from 42 patients whose tumors were sampled at multiple points. Two distinct methylation-based deconvolution analyses were performed to assess cellular composition. Radiomethylomic models were developed using support vector machines with features extracted from multi-parametric MRI.

resultsMulti-sampling analysis revealed that the proportion of stem-like cells among total malignant cells was homogeneously preserved within tumors. Tumors harboring a higher proportion of stem-like cells (stem-like tumors) showed significantly shorter overall survival and diminished benefits from O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Stem-like tumors showed a strong correlation with the RTK I subtype. Integrating physiological MRI features (diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast) with conventional sequences enhanced the performance of radiomethylomic models for predicting stem-like tumor status and prognostic stratification.

conclusionsOur findings reveal a homogeneous preservation of the proportion of stem-like cells over total malignant cells within GBM, establishing its significance as a tumor-wide feature. The development of radiomethylomic signatures shows potential for noninvasive assessment of tumor stemness, ultimately facilitating personalized treatment strategies in light of the prognostic impact of the feature.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA MethylationGlioblastomaNeoplastic Stem CellsAdultAgedDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsDNA methylationglioblastomaheterogeneityradiomicsstem-like cells

Identifiers

PMID40726154
PMCPMC12916731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.