Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726106›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2025

Plain language summaries supporting patient involvement: lessons and guidance from HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG).

Martin Andrew Coombes, Kate Morgan, Jose Diaz, Elisabeth M Oehrlein, Hayley Andersen, Ramiro Gilardino, Kawitha Helme, Fiona Pearce, Antonella Cardone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Two decades of impact: lessons from the HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martin Andrew CoombesOpened Door Consultancy Limited, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8354-0136
Kate MorganMyeloma Patients Europe, Edinburgh, UK.
Jose DiazBristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK.
Elisabeth M OehrleinApplied Patient Experience, Washington, DC, USA.
Hayley AndersenBristol Myers Squibb, Melbourne, Australia.
Ramiro GilardinoMSD Innovation & Development GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9238-7729
Kawitha HelmeNovartis Pharmaceuticals, London, UK.
Fiona PearceAgency for Care Effectiveness, Singapore, Singapore.
Antonella CardoneCancer Patients Europe, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient involvement is an increasingly recognized cornerstone of effective Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Clear, accessible information empowers patient organizations to contribute meaningfully to HTA. Therefore, an international Summary Information for Patient Groups template was developed to provide plain language summaries of new medicines being assessed. Pilots using the template were conducted in Australia in 2021 and England in 2022, providing a trial within the HTA process. In Australia, the Consumer Evidence and Engagement Unit (CEEU) used a workshop and survey, together with key stakeholder interviews, to gather feedback. In England, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence used public consultation, surveys, and a Short-Life Working Group (SLWG). An advisory board with patient organizations provided additional insights. The feedback enabled members of the HTA International Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA Interest Group to evaluate the potential to enhance patient organization submissions to HTA bodies and to provide recommendations on the template's implementation in HTA processes. The pilots highlighted that plain language summaries increased confidence and reduced preparation time for patient organization input to HTA. Other nonexpert stakeholders also found them valuable for fostering understanding. However, challenges remain, including mitigating bias in completed templates, allocating sufficient resources, and integrating into existing processes. The evaluation concludes that the approach holds significant potential to enhance patient organization involvement in HTA. Recommendations include setting up multi-stakeholder SLWGs, ensuring early access to summaries, and aligning implementation with local regulations. These insights provide guidance for HTA bodies to develop an approach to support patient involvement.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAustraliaCommunity ParticipationEnglandHumansLanguagePlain Language Summariesbiomedicalpatient involvementplain language summariestechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID40726106
PMCPMC12390740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.