ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025
State-dependent neural representations of muscle synergies in the spinal cord revealed by optogenetic stimulation.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuromotor modules revealed by direct electrical stimulation of the human primary motor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The central nervous system controls movement by combining neuromotor modules, known as muscle synergies. Previous studies suggest that spinal premotor interneurons (PreM-INs) contribute to the encoding of stable muscle synergies for voluntary movement. But descending and sensory inputs also influence motor outputs through the spinal interneuronal network, which may be configured by its inputs to encode different sets of muscle synergies depending on the network state, thereby recruiting different selections of synergies. Here we tested this possibility of state-dependent synergy encoding by examining the muscle synergies represented by the same upstream spinal interneurons under different activity states induced by various optogenetic stimulation patterns. Lumbosacral spinal units and electromyographic (EMG) activities of hindlimb muscles were simultaneously recorded from anaesthetized Thy1-ChR2 mice as the spinal cord was stimulated by one or two optic fibres at different intensities. The synergy encoded by each unit was revealed as a 'muscle field' derived from spike-triggered averages of EMG, whereas the entire muscle synergy set was factorized from the EMG. We found that although the muscle synergy set remained stable across stimulation conditions, the muscle fields of the same units were matched to different synergies within the set in different states. Thus the interneurons may flexibly adjust their connectivity with the motoneurons of the muscles as descending and sensory afferents impose different states on the spinal network. State-dependent encoding of muscle synergies may allow different synergies to be selected for producing stable movement in an ever-changing workspace environment. KEY POINTS: Muscle synergies for locomotion can be represented by spinal interneurons, as revealed by the interneurons' muscle fields derived from spike-triggered averages of EMG. The muscle field of a single spinal interneuron may vary under different stimulation conditions, as demonstrated by optogenetic stimulation. Encoding of muscle synergies is dependent on the state of spinal activities, thus facilitating the selection of appropriate synergies in different dynamic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.