Observational studyMedicine2025
The impact of the risk prevention nursing model on nursing risk events and satisfaction in pediatric care.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study evaluates the impact of a risk prevention nursing model on the incidence of nursing risk events, length of hospital stay, nursing satisfaction, family anxiety levels, and nursing staff risk prevention awareness in pediatric inpatient care. A total of 129 pediatric patients hospitalized at our institution from January 2022 to June 2024 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the nursing care model received: the observation group (n = 65) received care based on a structured risk prevention nursing model, while the control group (n = 64) received routine nursing care. Outcome measures included incidence of nursing risk events, length of stay, family members' anxiety levels (measured by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale), nursing satisfaction (measured by the Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales), and nursing staff risk prevention awareness. Statistical analyses were conducted using independent t-tests and chi-square tests, with significance set at P < .05. The incidence of nursing risk events was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (9.2% vs 35.9%, P = .0003). The mean length of hospital stay was shorter in the observation group (6.62 ± 2.38 days) compared to the control group (8.28 ± 2.72 days; P = .0007). Nursing satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the observation group for service attitude (4.62 ± 0.52 vs 3.92 ± 0.74, P = .0002), technical competence (4.39 ± 0.58 vs 3.81 ± 0.63, P = .0004), and health education (4.31 ± 0.72 vs 3.72 ± 0.80, P = .0006). Family anxiety levels were significantly lower in the observation group (42.30 ± 6.50) than in the control group (48.62 ± 7.18; P = .0009). Additionally, nursing staff in the observation group demonstrated significantly higher risk prevention awareness scores (88.47 ± 7.28 vs 75.13 ± 8.05; P = .0001). The risk prevention nursing model significantly improves pediatric care outcomes by reducing nursing risk events, shortening hospital stays, enhancing nursing satisfaction, lowering family anxiety, and improving nurses' awareness of risk prevention. These findings support the clinical value and broader implementation of this model in pediatric inpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.