Observational studyMedicine2025
Investigation of prolonged PCR positivity in COVID-19 patients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate prolonged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and evaluate the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RAgT) compared to real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). A prospective single-center study included 82 patients with prolonged PCR positivity (≥28 days). Serial RT-PCR and RAgT were performed at days 7 to 10, 14 to 20, and 28 to 30 post-diagnosis. Clinical data, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters (inflammatory markers, hematological, and biochemical profiles) were analyzed. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, Cohen Kappa, and receiver operating characteristic curve assessment. RAgT demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 74% specificity relative to RT-PCR, with strong agreement (Cohen κ = 0.803, P* < .001). Inflammatory markers were elevated: C-reactive protein (median 3.55 mg/L), ferritin (510 µg/L), and D-dimer (1400 ng/mL). Comorbidities were present in 62% of patients, primarily hypertension (17%) and diabetes mellitus (15%). Female patients exhibited higher inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and lactate dehydrogenase) and anemia prevalence. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed excellent discriminative performance (area under the curve = 0.99). RAgT showed high sensitivity in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 among patients with prolonged PCR positivity, suggesting potential utility in differentiating active infection from residual viral RNA. Persistent PCR positivity may correlate with noninfectious viral shedding, and RAgT could complement RT-PCR in clinical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and assess the impact of viral variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.