Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725830›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Advances and Challenges in Immunotherapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Clinical Strategies and Emerging Targets.

Mariana Grigoruta, Xiaohua Kong, Yong Qin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene Therapy Strategies for Uveal Melanoma: Adeno-associated Virus Delivery Challenges and Translational Opportunities.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mariana GrigorutaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2511-0914
Xiaohua KongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.
Yong QinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79902, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4743-938X

Funding

DOD Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program Idea Award W81XWH-19-1-0282NIH HHS 1R16GM145559-22The Lizanell and Colbert Coldwell Foundation Research GrantThe University of Texas at El Paso Startup fund of the School of PharmacyThe University of Texas at El Paso University Research Institute (URI) Award (14648680),
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM), the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, poses a unique clinical challenge due to its high propensity for liver metastasis and poor responsiveness to conventional therapies. Despite the expanding landscape of immunotherapy in oncology, progress in managing metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) remains limited, and no universally accepted standard of care has been established. In this review, we examine the current state and evolving strategies in immunotherapy for mUM, focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered therapies, and tumor-targeted vaccines. We also present a meta-analytical comparison of clinical outcomes between ICI monotherapy and combination regimens, alongside the recently FDA-approved T cell engager tebentafusp. Our analysis indicates that the triple combination of Ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 agents, and tebentafusp significantly enhances objective response rates, disease control rates, 1-year overall survival rates, and median overall survival (mOS) compared to ICI monotherapy alone. However, this enhanced efficacy is accompanied by increased toxicity due to broader immune activation. In contrast, tebentafusp offers superior tumor specificity and a more favorable safety profile in HLA-A*02:01-positive patients, positioning it as a preferred therapeutic option for this genetically defined subset of UM. Additionally, early-phase studies involving dendritic cell-based immunotherapies and peptide vaccines has shown encouraging signs of tumor-specific immune activation, along with improved tolerability. Collectively, this review underscores the urgent need for more precise and effective immunotherapeutic approaches tailored to the unique biology of mUM.

Indexed as

checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapymetastatic uveal melanomaTCR-based therapyTebentafuspvaccines

Identifiers

PMID40725830
PMCPMC12295115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.