ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
A Simple Ratio in a Complex Disease: Exploring the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unleashing innovative cross-organ fibrosis therapies by harnessing the omics revolution.JCI insight · 2026Review
- Immunosenescence in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- A biomarker-guided framework for corticosteroid treatment stratification in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of inflammation-coagulation-autoantibody triad in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- Retrospective Observational Study of Nintedanib in Managing Idiopathic and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Routine Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple, inexpensive and easily accessible inflammatory biomarker that reflects the balance between innate and adaptive immunity. In recent years, NLR has emerged as a potential prognostic and disease severity marker for different diseases, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a progressive and fatal interstitial lung disease with a highly variable course and poor prognosis. Several studies have highlighted that NLR can be associated with several clinical outcomes such as lung function decline, increased risk of hospitalization, acute exacerbation of IPF, and mortality over time. It might also correlate with overall survival in the course of antifibrotic therapy and validated prognostic score as a gender-age-physiology score. Despite these findings, the clinical use of NLR remains limited due to its non-specific nature, the lack of standardized cut-off values, and high variability related to demographic factors, comorbidities and medications. Hence, NLR may display the underlying immune dysregulation in IPF and could be exploited as a non-invasive tool for risk stratification and disease monitoring. Further studies are needed to confirm and validate its use in IPF and to establish reliable cut-off values in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.