ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Hemostasis Laboratory Diagnostics in Newborns.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy in the Light of Developmental Hemostasis: Friend or Foe?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Optical Biosensors for Blood Coagulation Monitoring: Advantages, Limitations, and Translational Potential.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Venous malformation with localized intravascular coagulopathy in children treated with sclerotherapy and LWMH.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Therapeutic role of low molecular weight heparin and fat-soluble vitamins in pregnancy-associated prethrombotic conditions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Unveiling the Hemostatic Signature of Prematurity: A Prospective Rotational Thromboelastometry-Based Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hemostatic system in the newborn is a complex entity, characterized by dynamism in its development; therefore, the correct measurement of its potential is challenging. In this narrative review, we analyzed the current knowledge of the "developmental hemostasis" of the newborn; we also studied the performance of routine coagulation tests in its evaluation, with considerations about the establishment of neonatal age-specific normal ranges and about the role of preanalytical variables, in particular, hematocrit (which could represent an important cause of error); we also focused on the increasing importance of viscoelastic coagulation tests, which are becoming increasingly widespread (especially in some settings such as intensive care unit) and are able to quickly provide information about the hemostatic function of the newborn, even if they lack adequate standardization in the neonatal period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.