ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Non-Invasive Ventilation: When, Where, How to Start, and How to Stop.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Liberation from Non-Invasive Ventilation in Complex Intensive Care Unit Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond blood gases: diaphragm-guided sequential non-invasive ventilation for COPD with type II respiratory failure.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a cornerstone in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure, offering critical support without the risks of intubation. However, successful weaning from NIV remains a complex, high-stakes process. Poorly timed or improperly executed weaning significantly increases morbidity and mortality, yet current clinical practice often relies on subjective judgment rather than evidence-based protocols. This manuscript reviews the current landscape of NIV weaning, emphasizing structured approaches, objective monitoring, and predictors of weaning success or failure. It examines guideline-based indications, monitoring strategies, and various weaning techniques-gradual and abrupt-with evidence of their efficacy across different patient populations. Predictive tools such as the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index, Lung Ultrasound Score, Diaphragm Thickening Fraction, ROX index, and HACOR score are analyzed for their diagnostic value. Additionally, this review underscores the importance of care setting-ICU, step-down unit, or general ward-and how it influences outcomes. Finally, it highlights critical gaps in research, especially around weaning in non-ICU environments. By consolidating current evidence and identifying predictors and pitfalls, this article aims to support clinicians in making safe, timely, and patient-specific NIV weaning decisions. In the current literature, there are gaps regarding patient selection and lack of universal protocolization for initiation and de-escalation of NIV as the data has been scattered. This review aims to consolidate the relevant information to be utilized by clinicians throughout multiple levels of care in all hospital systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.