ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Modern Perspectives on Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Narrative Review on Surgical Techniques, Mesh Selection and Fixation Strategies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mesh fixation versus non-fixation in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Does mesh fixation reduce recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of biological versus synthetic meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair: Biomechanical Investigation of the Cause of Recurrence.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia mesh repair in Palestine: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Mapping the scientific landscape of robotic hernia repair: a bibliometric and topic modeling analysis of thematic transitions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgeons' preferences in the management of recurrence after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A nationwide survey.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Early Complications and Length of Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Differences in Long-term Quality of Life Assessed by the EuraHS-QoL Scale between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Exploring the application of the TAPP procedure for the treatment of upper abdominal ventral hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Healthcare System Transition in Kazakhstan and Its Impact on Inguinal Hernia Repair Outcomes: A Multidisciplinary Comparative Analysis of TEP, TIPP, and Open Lichtenstein Procedures.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a single-center retrospective study in Taiwan.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Risk factors for recurrence and surgical site infection after abdominal wall hernia repair: a systematic review and meta analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Dual-Mesh Laparoscopic TEP Technique.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, with over 20 million cases annually. The evolution of hernia surgery has transitioned from tension-based techniques to tension-free approaches, significantly reducing recurrence rates. This review explores the history, advancements, and current trends in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, focusing on laparoscopic techniques such as transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally extraperitoneal (TEP), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and robotic-assisted repair. The importance of prosthetic meshes is emphasized, detailing their mechanical properties, pore size, weight classifications, and biocompatibility. Additionally, various mesh fixation methods-including tacks, sutures, and glues-are analyzed, with a discussion on their impact on postoperative complications such as chronic pain, adhesions, and infection risk. The debate between TAPP and TEP techniques is examined, highlighting the ongoing quest to determine the most effective approach. Emerging advancements, including drug-loaded meshes and dual-layered prosthetics, aim to improve integration and reduce complications. Despite significant progress, no universally superior technique or mesh exists, underscoring the need for individualized surgical approaches. Future research should focus on optimizing materials, refining fixation strategies, and enhancing patient outcomes in minimally invasive hernia repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.