ArticleGenes2025
Boosting Genomic Prediction Transferability with Sparse Testing.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sparse phenotyping for wheat grain yield enabled by multiomics prediction.The plant genome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesImproving sparse testing is essential for enhancing the efficiency of genomic prediction (GP). Accordingly, new strategies are being explored to refine genomic selection (GS) methods under sparse testing conditions.
methodsIn this study, a sparse testing approach was evaluated, specifically in the context of predicting performance for tested lines in untested environments. Sparse testing is particularly practical in large-scale breeding programs because it reduces the cost and logistical burden of evaluating every genotype in every environment, while still enabling accurate prediction through strategic data use. To achieve this, we used training data from CIMMYT (Obregon, Mexico), along with partial data from India, to predict line performance in India using observations from Mexico.
resultsOur results show that incorporating data from Obregon into the training set improved prediction accuracy, with greater effectiveness when the data were temporally closer. Across environments, Pearson's correlation improved by at least 219% (in a testing proportion of 50%), while gains in the percentage of matching in top 10% and 20% of top lines were 18.42% and 20.79%, respectively (also in a testing proportion of 50%).
conclusionsThese findings emphasize that enriching training data with relevant, temporally proximate information is key to enhancing genomic prediction performance; conversely, incorporating unrelated data can reduce prediction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.