ArticleGenes2025
Detecting Methylation Changes Induced by Prime Editing.
Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While prime editing offers improved precision compared to traditional CRISPR-Cas9 systems, concerns remain regarding potential off-target effects, including epigenetic changes such as DNA methylation. In this study, we investigated whether prime editing induces aberrant CpG methylation patterns. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing revealed overall methylation similarity between Cas9-edited, and PE2-edited cells. However, localized epigenetic changes were observed, particularly in CpG islands and exon regions. The PE2-edited group showed a higher proportion of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in some coding sequences compared to controls and Cas9-edited samples. Notably, CpG island methylation reached 0.18% in the PE2 vs. Cas9 comparison, indicating a higher susceptibility of these regulatory elements to epigenetic alterations by prime editing. Molecular function analyses including Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway analyses further revealed enrichment in molecular functions related to transcriptional regulation and redox activity in PE2-edited cells. These findings suggest that prime editing, while precise, may introduce subtle but functionally relevant methylation changes that could influence gene expression and cellular pathways. In summary, prime editing can induce localized DNA methylation changes in human cells, particularly within regulatory and coding regions. Understanding these epigenetic consequences is critical for the development of safer and more effective therapeutic applications of genome editing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.