ArticleInsects2025
Bee Hotels as a Tool for Post-Fire Recovery of Cavity-Nesting Native Bees.
Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial for theInsects · 2026Article
- Nesting and Foraging Preferences of Four Sympatric Species of Cavity-Nesting Leafcutting Bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).Insects · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wildfires are increasing in extent and severity under anthropogenic climate change, with potential adverse impacts on native pollinators like wild bees. In 2019/2020, wildfires burned swathes of the Australian bushland. Whilst herbaceous angiosperms may flower in the post-fire environment, providing sustenance to native bees, pre-made holes created by wood-boring beetles that obligate cavity-nesting "renter" bees may take a longer time to recover. This may prevent native bees from colonising new areas or reduce the populations that have survived. To date, trap-nests, also known as bee hotels, have never been used as a tool to assist in providing nesting resources in post-fire environments. The project "Bee hotels to boost bees after bushfires" supported the recovery of native bee populations by installing artificial nesting substrates (bee hotels) in areas of high biodiversity value that were impacted by the 2019/2020 bushfires. This was achieved through monitoring of 1000 bee hotels (500 bamboo and 500 wooden) and visual surveys at five burnt sites and three control sites (nearby burnt sites without bee hotels) by a native bee ecologist from September-March 2021/2022. The bee hotel uptake was low initially, but by March, all hotels were occupied. Over 800 nests were created by bees in the bee hotels installed for this project and significantly more bees were observed in sites with bee hotels compared to control sites. Across sites, there was a significant negative association between honeybee density and nest occupancy, suggesting honeybees may be exerting competitive pressure on native bees in post-fire habitats. In conclusion, bee hotels, if designed correctly, can aid in boosting cavity-nesting bee populations following fires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.