Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725259›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Thriving or Withering? Plant Molecular Cytogenetics in the First Quarter of the 21st Century.

Elzbieta Wolny, Luis A J Mur, Nobuko Ohmido, Zujun Yin, Kai Wang, Robert Hasterok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Genomes of Species fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elzbieta WolnyPlant Cytogenetics and Molecular Biology Group, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7588-4830
Luis A J MurDepartment of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Edward Llwyd Building, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-9817
Nobuko OhmidoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.
Zujun YinState Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4054-681X
Kai WangSchool of Life Sciences, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1074-0438
Robert HasterokPlant Cytogenetics and Molecular Biology Group, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6667-2721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly four decades have passed since fluorescence in situ hybridisation was first applied in plants to support molecular cytogenetic analyses across a wide range of species. Subsequent advances in DNA sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and microscopy, together with the immunolocalisation of various nuclear components, have provided unprecedented insights into the cytomolecular organisation of the nuclear genome in both model and non-model plants, with crop species being perhaps the most significant. The ready availability of sequenced genomes is now facilitating the application of state-of-the-art cytomolecular techniques across diverse plant species. However, these same advances in genomics also pose a challenge to the future of plant molecular cytogenetics, as DNA sequence analysis is increasingly perceived as offering comparable insights into genome organisation. This perception persists despite the continued relevance of FISH-based approaches for the physical anchoring of genome assemblies to chromosomes. Furthermore, cytogenetic approaches cannot currently rival purely genomic methods in terms of throughput, standardisation, and automation. This review highlights the latest key topics in plant cytomolecular research, with particular emphasis on chromosome identification and karyotype evolution, chromatin and interphase nuclear organisation, chromosome structure, hybridisation and polyploidy, and cytogenetics-assisted crop improvement. In doing so, it underscores the distinctive contributions that cytogenetic techniques continue to offer in genomic research. Additionally, we critically assess future directions and emerging opportunities in the field, including those related to CRISPR/Cas-based live-cell imaging and chromosome engineering, as well as AI-assisted image analysis and karyotyping.

Indexed as

Cytogenetic AnalysisCytogeneticsPlantsChromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantGenomicsIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePolyploidychromosomechromosome markerscytogeneticscytomolecular analysisFISHfluorescence in situ hybridisationinterphase nucleuskaryotypeplant molecular cytogeneticsplant nuclear genome

Identifiers

PMID40725259
PMCPMC12295485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.