Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725243›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

AI-Driven Polypharmacology in Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.

Mena Abdelsayed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Large Library Docking for Polypharmacology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mena AbdelsayedLankenau Institute for Medical Research, 100 E Lancaster Ave., Penn Wynne, PA 19096, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polypharmacology, the rational design of small molecules that act on multiple therapeutic targets, offers a transformative approach to overcome biological redundancy, network compensation, and drug resistance. This review outlines the scientific rationale for polypharmacology, highlighting its success across oncology, neurodegeneration, metabolic disorders, and infectious diseases. Emphasis is placed on how polypharmacological agents can synergize therapeutic effects, reduce adverse events, and improve patient compliance compared to combination therapies. We also explore how computational methods-spanning ligand-based modeling, structure-based docking, network pharmacology, and systems biology-enable target selection and multi-target ligand prediction. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, reinforcement learning, and generative models, have further accelerated the discovery and optimization of multi-target agents. These AI-driven platforms are capable of de novo design of dual and multi-target compounds, some of which have demonstrated biological efficacy in vitro. Finally, we discuss the integration of omics data, CRISPR functional screens, and pathway simulations in guiding multi-target design, as well as the challenges and limitations of current AI approaches. Looking ahead, AI-enabled polypharmacology is poised to become a cornerstone of next-generation drug discovery, with potential to deliver more effective therapies tailored to the complexity of human disease.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryPolypharmacologySmall Molecule LibrariesAnimalsHumansSmall Molecule Librariesartificial intelligence (AI)computational drug discoverydeep learninggenerative modelsmulti-target drug designnetwork pharmacologypolypharmacology

Identifiers

PMID40725243
PMCPMC12295758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.